|
Timid new world;
Scenario: The Fake BioTerror control Paradigm for a 4th Industrial technocratic slave state
By Capt Wardrobe Nov 2020
Part 1 - Doom! Doom! Doom!
Dark Winter? - Psyops of fear-a-ganda?
"The FBI's search for the person who mailed anthrax-laced letters that killed five persons has focused on a former U.S. scientist who worked at a government laboratory where he learned how to make a weapons-grade strain of the deadly bacteria. "
"The anthrax spores enclosed in envelopes mailed to two leading Senate Democrats in October are biologically identical to bacteria secretly manufactured at a US germ warfare facility during the last decade, according to press reports and an analysis by a leading microbiologist."
`It seems the attacker ... wanted to force through an increase in the budget for U.S. research on biological weapons.''
...the attacker, who used anthrax-laced mail, had probably wanted to cause panic rather than kill anyone.
'Leaked document?' via Whitney Webb
University of Pittsburgh Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC)
"Putting a viral spike protein on a bacteria is not going to produce a viable disease as bacteria dont enter cells, they reproduce independently. That's why it would have been approved.
I'm not sure what value this study has though. " [source]
There is little life on the Scottish island of Gruinard - which was known for years as the Island of Death.
Even today, there are seldom any visitors to the isle apart from perhaps the odd curious kayaker lapping at its shores or a fisherman collecting a stranded buoy.
Gruinard has effectively been a no go zone for almost 80 years after it became a top-secret UK government test centre for biological weapons during World War Two.
The Scotsman 2019
Modern History: Weaponizing Anthrax and Terrorism
Research into the utilization of anthrax spores as a biological weapon began in the early twentieth century. During World War I, German development of B. anthracis and other disease-causing organisms gave rise to covert programs intended to infect livestock and animal feed to be exported to the Allies. These plans included contaminating feed for horses and cattle to be exported from the United States to England, infecting sheep from Romania to be exported to Russia, and exporting contaminated livestock from Argentina to various Allied nations (Merck, 1946; Hugh-Jones, 1992).
During World War II, the pace of anthrax and biological weapons research in general accelerated. Imperial Japan had a large, active bioweapons program that included a substantial anthrax component. The central Japanese research facility was located in Manchuria, known as Unit 731. It is believed that in excess of 10,000 prisoners of war died either by direct experimental exposure to B. anthracis, among other pathogens, or by execution after exposure (Harris, 1992, 1994). Much of the Japanese bioweapons research transitioned to the battlefield. Operations such as Nomonhan in 1939, where Japanese troops entered the Soviet Union to infect Russian herds, met with only partial success. As it turned out, Japanese troops were unprepared to operate in a biological weapons environment. Their actions resulted in many inadvertent friendly casualties (Harris, 1992).
The Allies were pursuing biological weapons programs at the same time as the Axis powers. In 1942, the United Kingdom conducted anthrax experiments off the coast of Scotland at Gruinard Island. British scientists working at the biological weapons laboratory at Porton Down had demonstrated the lethality and military utility of the bacillus. Spores persisted and remained theoretically capable of infection for decades afterwards. A subsequent decontamination effort took nearly 10 years to clean the island (Carter, 1992). The United States began developing anthrax as a biological weapon in 1943. A civilian agency, the War Reserve Service, constructed a research facility at Camp Detrick (later Fort Detrick in 1956) and conducted research on a number of pathogens, including B. anthracis.
By Sharon Begley, Julie Steenhuysen - June 21 2014 - (Reuters) -
The safety breach at a government lab that may have exposed 84 workers to live anthrax centered on a pivotal lapse in procedure: researchers working with the bacteria waited 24 hours to be sure they had killed the pathogens, half the time required by a new scientific protocol.
The lab designed to handle extremely dangerous pathogens at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta unknowingly sent live samples of anthrax to labs with fewer safeguards, where the exposure occurred. No one has died or fallen ill but dozens are being treated with a vaccine and powerful antibiotics to keep them from becoming sick.
The exposure incident is unprecedented in the history of American research on bioweapons and other deadly pathogens, prompting alarm among researchers who have already warned about the consequences of lax laboratory oversight globally. Scientists in and out of the CDC say the process of handling such bacteria and viruses must be improved.
That Darned Covid 19 sure is dangyroos!
I don't know about you but when i see 'Hollywood Movie' pop up in a serious piece, my spidey senses prick up!
Think about it! Is Covid really THAT dangerous?
University researchers genetically engineer a human pandemic virus. They inject the new virus into a laboratory mouse. The infected mouse then bites a researcher…..It is a plot worthy of a Hollywood blockbuster about risky coronavirus research.
But according to newly obtained minutes of the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) of the University of North Carolina (UNC), Chapel Hill, these exact events need not be imagined. They occurred for real between April 1st and May 6th this year.
The identity of the bitten coronavirus researcher has not been revealed except that they were working in a high security BSL-3 virus lab when the accident happened.
According to Richard Ebright, an epidemiologist from Rutgers University, the UNC incident underscores an important development in virus research since the pandemic began:
“There has been an explosion of research involving fully infectious SARS-CoV-2 over the last six months. Research with infectious SARS-CoV-2 now is occurring in every, or almost every, BSL-3 facility in the US and overseas.”
This strong upsurge is affirmed by Edward Hammond of Prickly Research, Austin, TX, former Director of the Sunshine Project, an NGO that tracked the post 9/11 expansion of the US Biodefense program.
“It is evident that swarms of academic researchers with little prior experience with coronaviruses have leapt into the field in recent months.”
For Hammond, this explosion represents a hazard:
“We need to be clear headed about the risk. The first SARS virus was a notorious source of laboratory-acquired infections and there is a very real risk that modified forms of SARS-CoV-2 could infect researchers, especially inexperienced researchers, with unpredictable and potentially quite dangerous results. The biggest risk is the creation and accidental release of a novel form of SARS-CoV-2 — a variant whose altered characteristics might undermine global efforts to stop the pandemic by evading the approaches being taken to find COVID vaccines and treatments.”
And, continues Hammond: “Each additional lab that experiments with CoV-2 amplifies the risk.”
Richard Ebright concurs, telling Independent Science News in an email that this research is:
“in many cases being performed by researchers who have no prior experience in BSL-3 operations and pathogens research, and who therefore pose elevated risk of laboratory accidents with BSL-3 pathogens.”
CRISPR in Home Lab - the future terrorist attack / accident?
The documentary delves into what is considered by many a rogue field in which scientists and researchers — as well as people without medical training or scientific expertise — perform DIY genetic experiments in a quest to develop cures for viruses and diseases.
Biohacking holds that removing the obstacles imposed by government regulators and Big Pharma expedites the path to effective new treatments and mass availability.
PSYOP GIVEAWAY = (Some of those featured in the documentary are working on developing a COVID-19 vaccine.)
Months Before Coronavirus Rocked the World, Cambridge University Warned of Race-Specific Bioweapons
The Bio Terror Bible - excellent sources
The Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), which entered into force in 1975, supplemented the Geneva Protocol. It was the first multilateral disarmament treaty to ban the production and use of an entire category of weapons. The BTWC has currently 165 States Parties and 12 signatories. It aims at banning the development, production, stockpiling, acquisition, retention, transfer, and use of biological weapons by anyone.
However, unlike the Chemical Weapons Convention, the treaty lacks verification and compliance procedures, and there is no implementing body to monitor observance. An attempt was made in 1991 to establish a verification system, but the talks collapsed due essentially to a withdrawal of cooperation by the USA. Several developments in the 1990s revealed that the BTWC does not prevent states from conducting biological weapons programmes (example: Russia and Iraq, both signatories to the Convention had conducted clandestine bioweapons programmes) showing that the current regime is inadequate.
Cambridge University - Centre fot the study of Catastprophic risk
"Whether it occurs by a quirk of nature or at the hand of a terrorist, epidemiologists say a fast-moving airborne pathogen could kill more than 30 million people in less than a year," he said. "And they say there is a reasonable probability the world will experience such an outbreak in the next 10 to 15 years."
"The good news is that with advances in biotechnology, new vaccines and drugs can help prevent epidemics from spreading out of control,"
"I'm optimistic that a decade from now, we can be much better prepared for a lethal epidemic if we're willing to put a fraction of what we spend on defense budgets and new weapons systems into epidemic readiness,"
Event 201
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.
In recent years, the world has seen a growing number of epidemic events, amounting to approximately 200 events annually. These events are increasing, and they are disruptive to health, economies, and society. Managing these events already strains global capacity, even absent a pandemic threat. Experts agree that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global—a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences. A severe pandemic, which becomes “Event 201,” would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions.
|
