A Monkey Wrench in the Gears?
Capt Wardrobe - April/May 2021
  |
Truth & Conscequences
Revolution? or The Naivity of Denialism?
Many people are, rightly, in my opinion
citing the emergence of the Global corporate technocratic
state as a threat to human sovereignty.
We can also witness many of such 'warriors' being
from a religious background spanning across multiple
Theologies.
This Battle has been framed by such groups as a Spiritual war against an
ever apparent futurist agenda to introduce the economics of Crypto currency,
Blockchain enabled smart control of societal systems,
infrastucture and human interfaces within it.
It is feared that exponential technological advancement noted by Professer Moore
will lead to a society of Man machine/system interfaces and full on Transhumanism.
|
 |
|
Get off my slavery...!
|
 |
|
The Data gold rush is upon us.
Many are noting this may lead to a society
built upon the notion that all humans are avatars
placed within a realm of game-like badge earning and level-up
aspiration. The interactions members of this society have with
the "internet of" things / bodies / minds, provide the
Information corporation state, [see Alphabat / Blackrock]
with data sets based on behavior.
|
 |
 |
This in turn will become a new economic market. Investors as Stakeholders will be able to own a return in the consequences of human interactions within the technocratic control mechanism. The economic leaders of this new order are Members of globally influencial think tanks, political economists, steering, most notably - Military Industrial complex / Agriculture - Health biotech / Fin-Tech / Energy / Media... and the result of this push sees every single industry reliant on sustaining civil society within smart city linked globo-environments having to aquiesce for fear of insolvency. |
 |
Those nutty religious types
Concerned with the possible advent of Transhumanism
many can be observed as using such a threat to
preach the gospel, revelations in particular - with
the defining of the emergence of the 4th industrial revolution
as an all encompassing "Beast System".
This dogmatic fundamental form of Christianity takes the Bible Literally.
It's not hard to see why people are scared.
Many can see that the systems being introduced all around them
is soulless, anti human. Learned Knowledge is treated as Data.
Diseases, bodies & brains are seen as the plaything of Scientism.
A dogmatic type of religious treatment of The Sciences & Systems that promotes "versions" of science as unswayable fact.
Belief is becoming a Force. A form of control. And there seems to be battle lines forming. Recruitment is in effect.
|
Fundamentalism Vs Scientism?
  |
A first important point is that the USA has had much to do with the Bible, but little with Plato, Thomas Aquinas, al-Ghazali or Voltaire. Truth tends to be seen, not the product of reasoning, but as "what works." In the field of religion this basically means, it makes something that makes one feel good or achieves visible results of some kind. There is a surprising affinity here between two worlds which are apparently at violent odds with each other: Christian fundamentalism and the New Age. Both certainly "feel good", provide "inner experience" and make very definite promises, which may include anything from miraculous healing to success in business. Of course, in order to feel good or to enjoy the miracles, one must "believe": according to the Christians in Jesus, according to the New Age people in one's own divinity, but the final result is not so different. People "discover Jesus" in very much the same way they discover a new kind of psychotherapy; and since "belief" in both cases is fundamental, failure is not due to the quality of the product, but to the lack of "belief" in the consumer.
A second point of the American Religion is its entrepreneurial nature. It has little to do with the solemn institutions of the old world, with their reassuring connection to tradition, although of course staid, "mainstream" churches do exist. As in business, the religious entrepreneur must swim or die. He must create the emotions that make people "feel good", he must make the lame at least think they can walk, otherwise his church, not supported by any government funds, will be deserted for more interesting places. The extraordinary vulgarity of Jimmy Swaggart or Jack Van Impe is shocking to Christians from other cultures, but necessary in its context. And it does, alas, work. |
 |
 |
|
 |
Under the new guidelines, employers are allowed to adopt mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies. But the commission warned that any such policy would be subject to certain anti-discrimination laws.
In terms of religion, the commission points toward Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This legislation requires employers to reasonably accommodate an employee’s sincerely held religious belief, practice or observance – but only if the accommodation can be made without “undue hardship” on the employer’s business.
The new guidelines echo earlier court rulings that take a broad definition of religion as including “moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong” that are held by the believer with the same sincerity as that of traditional religions.
As such, opposition to mandatory vaccines could be made from members of smaller faith communities as well as from adherents of more mainstream religions. For example some Christian Scientists and members of the Dutch Reformed Church are opposed to vaccination. There have also been legal challenges brought where employees state that their Christian beliefs require they avoid inoculation.
|
|
Many activists are stating they wish to go off grid.
To form self sustaining collectives. Away from the surveillance
of the New World Order.
We must beware of the very real possibilty
that this type of Utopian isolationism could facilitate
the creation of a neo luddite technophobic religious order.
Within this emerging paradigm,
Home schooling within these 'out of system' communitys
has the disadvantage that it
takes children away from being able learn certain 'realitys'
within the education system that aims to brainwash them.
One could witness such peaceful communitys, helpless & isolated against advanced tech.
Is it possible to revolt against a system
when the technology [see artificially intelligent armed war drones]
gives The MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX a clear strategic advantage of power & physical coercive aggressive force over such
peaceful and well meaning people?
|
  |
|
This video Posted by OFF Guardian - Says it all -
Do you really want to go "back to New Normal"?
Do you have to aquiesce your rights in order to belong to & take part in a society that is based on greed and consumerism & dumbed down idiocy? An ever growing Prison, trapping its citizens in a total surveillence data slavery.
The last part of it - illustrates the point i am making on this page perfectly...a Paradigm is being built - Traditional spiritualialsm is being framed in opposition against a New form Corporate materialistic theology, built on the religion of scientism, Transcendence from Human 1.0 - into Bio Machinery & a steered evolution via Transhumanism that may well lead to a digital rapture; A non physical existence within a 'mainframe' Matrix of reality composed of pure data.
|
|
how far is too far?
|
What are the moral implications of this?
Infiltration into the hive mind may well be necessary.
We must think of the future and the future is the young.
What are the moral implications of teaching children the methods
of control and how to usurp and reverse engineer such methodic
indoctrination as they attend such programs inside the walls of 'the enemy'?
Indeed would be necessary for these generations of the future after graduating, to join the system - aware, highly educated & armed with a way to destroy it from within? A kind of Army of Sleepers that wriggle in the underbelly of 'the beast'. This was illustrated rather beautifully in the Movie Fight Club.
|
|
 [note; infiltration of the system would happen without the Male exclusivity, secret bare knuckle boxing matches / Militaristic depatterning.] |
Fincher’s movie, based off Chuck Palahniuk’s 1996 novel of the same name, follows an unnamed narrator (Edward Norton) who suffers from insomnia. Initially able to prey off support groups for the emotional catharsis they provide, that outlet is ruined when he encounters Marla (Helena Bonham Carter), who’s also a “faker.” Once again cursed with insomnia, the narrator eventually crosses paths with Tyler Durden, a handsome and charismatic soap salesman who lives the way the narrator wishes he could live. After the narrator’s apartment explodes, he asks for help from Tyler, and Tyler agrees to take him in on the condition that he “hit him as hard as he can.” This interaction blossoms into Fight Club which transforms into increasingly destructive acts against society.
The narrator eventually realizes that he is Tyler Durden and he’s been interacting with a figment of his imagination. He shoots himself in the head, killing Tyler but only hitting the narrator’s cheek. The narrator finally accepts that he loves Marla and needs to be rid of Tyler while Tyler’s actions cause the destruction of the credit card companies around them, potentially setting off a worldwide financial panic and the collapse of society.
|
 Use this at your own risk |
Wrecking
(Russian: vreditel'stvo, lit. "inflicting damage", "harming"),
was a crime specified in the criminal code of the Soviet Union in the Stalin era. It is often translated as "sabotage"; however, "wrecking", "diversionist acts", and "counter-revolutionary sabotage" were distinct sub-articles of Article 58 (RSFSR Penal Code) (58-7, 58-9, and 58-14 respectively), and the meaning of "wrecking" is closer to "undermining". These three categories were distinguished in the following way: * Diversions were acts of immediate infliction of physical damage on state and cooperative property. * Wrecking was deliberate acts aimed against normal functioning of state and cooperative organisations, such as giving deliberately wrong commands. * Sabotage was non-execution, or careless execution, of one's duties. As applied in practice, "wrecking" and "sabotage" referred to any action which negatively affected the economy, including failing to meet unrealistic economic targets, allegedly causing poor morale among subordinates (e.g. by complaining about conditions of work), lack of effort, or other incompetence. Thus, it referred to economic or industrial sabotage in the very broadest sense. The definition of sabotage was interpreted dialectically and indirectly, so any form of non-compliance with Party directives could have been considered a 'sabotage'.
|
 |
"It was astonishing that the pseudo wreckers, who knew perfectly well that they weren't wreckers, believed that military men and priests were being shaken up justifiably. The military men, who knew they hadn't worked for foreign intelligence services and had not sabotaged the Red Army, believed readily enough that the engineers were wreckers and that the priests deserved to be destroyed. Imprisoned, the Soviet person reasoned in the following way: I personally am innocent, but any methods are justified in dealing with those others, the enemies. The lessons of interrogation and the cell failed to enlighten such people. Even after they themselves had been convicted, they retained the blind beliefs of their days in freedom: belief in universal conspiracies, poisonings, wrecking, espionage." Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn |
  |
  |
Don't like being pushed around? you're a Terrorist.
The Antiscience Movement Is Escalating, Going Global and Killing Thousands
Rejection of mainstream science and medicine has become a key feature of the political right in the U.S. and increasingly around the world
"Antiscience has emerged as a dominant and highly lethal force, and one that threatens global security, as much as do terrorism and nuclear proliferation.
We must mount a counteroffensive and build new infrastructure to combat antiscience, just as we have for these other more widely recognized and established threats."
Peter J. Hotez
|
Are you willing to be a Terrorist? Is this kind of Action Inevitable?
The Monkey Wrench Gang is set in the desert regions of the American southwest. Think Arizona, New Mexico and Utah. It was published in 1975 and remember that the city of Page was founded in 1957, the Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado river was inaugurated in 1964 and that Lake Powell was a result of this dam. All these constructions are fresh in memories and make the news when Abbey wrote his novel. The area changes rapidly with the development of tourism, the construction of interstates and other huge works of engineering.
The Monkey Wrench Gang relates the fast-paced journey of four ill-assorted environmental activists. Or at least, that’s how we’d call them now. Dr Sarvis, Bonnie Abbzug, George Washington Hayduke and Seldom Seen Smith joined their forces to sabotage machines, bridges and constructions to slow down the roadwork and constructions sites in natural places. They can’t bear the scars that these human works do to the natural landscape.
Book Around The Corner
|
 |
 |
Will there even be Schools & Universities? Or will everything be a Hive Mind remote Home indoctrination cult?
Adversary knowledge bases.
The deconstructing of Corporate Public relations & messaging must be taught
in order for generations to have the ability 'not be controlled'.
We may have the unenviable task of
placing children into mainstream education
so they can learn the methods & technology that
will give them the educated opportunity & ability to fight against it.
|
  |
Will the New World Order [TM] allow this to happen, allow isolation from it's reach?
The opposite is true when considering setting up
communities that are outside of the norm.
The corporate technocratic state would find
it politically expediant to, via special forces / undercover units, infiltrate outsider communities.
Co-intel pro style operations collect data
and active intelligence whilst also potentially
have the aim of steering groups in a certain direction.
This could be politically useful in maintaining
a percieved enemy of the state by creating agent provocateurs
for a 'terror' group alligning itself with, disrupting
destroying critical infrastrutcure. The creation of such groups is useful for the State as a paradigm control mechanism, and also justifies a continuance of military expansionism and development.
There is a war coming.
To be forewarned is to be prepared.
|
COMMUNITARIANISM
Civil society from liberal and communitarian perspectives
In the communitarian approach, the individual is considered as a part of the social whole. He is socially conscious and associates with his counterparts out of solidarity and desire to live as a community.
In other words, he is a member of the community rather than an autonomous individual.
The second facet is the role of the state. In the liberal approach, the state has a limited role. Its role is reduced to administrating justice in the society and being a framework for civil society. It conducts a non-intervention policy towards the private aspect of individuals’ lives. Civil society institutions have to constantly check upon the state in order to prevent its monopoly. In the communitarian approach, civil society and the state are complementary elements of the whole. It not only frames civil society but also guides it to the common good.
The state is a necessary condition for the existence of civil society since it keeps it away from self-destruction. The third facet is the institutions of civil society. The liberal approach of civil society includes political associations and economic institutions established merely on a voluntary basis. The communitarian approach also includes associations but they can be based not only on voluntarism but also on corporatism and communitarianism.
|
The Communitarian Turn: Myth or Reality?
The term ‘‘communitarian turn’’ itself needs some clarification. I am referring
to a perceived—or argued for—shift in bioethics over the last decade or so,
involving greater emphasis on principles of solidarity, equity, and public good, as
opposed to the predominance of autonomy-based argument.
|
|
The one health movement - 1982
A Communitarian Ethical Model for Public Health Interventions:
An Alternative to Individual Behavior Change Strategies
|
|
Public health ethics
The discipline of public health ethics has
developed rapidly during the past two
decades.
Its central focus has been on articu-
lating and exploring the ethical issues that
arise in the pursuit of population health. This
has resulted in a focus on concepts such as
the common good, equity, solidarity, reci-
procity, and population well-being.
This is
not to say that more individual values such
as autonomy, privacy, and individual rights
and liberties are not also important ethical
considerations; however, these more “social”
or “public” values are reflected in related yet
not wholly overlapping concepts that capture
the broad importance of community and the
affirmative duty to act.
Some in the field use
the language of solidarity (40), drawing on
the communitarian tradition in public health
(41); others describe the mutual obligations
of reciprocity (42). The Nuffield Council on
Bioethics sought to capture the duties and
responsibilities of government in relation to
public health by the concept of “steward-
ship” (36)
WHO guidelines on ethical issues in public health surveillance
© World Health Organization 2017
|
|
There is little quarrel that access by medical and health policy researchers to medical records and claims data has spurred advances in quality and access to medical treatment. Nevertheless, dissatisfaction lingers with the regime used to regulate access to that information.
The American regulatory regime on medical record access has politely been characterized as “fragmented” and less politely as a “black hole.” U.S. Senator Edward M. Kennedy asserts, “[t]oday, video rental records have greater protection than sensitive medical information.” At the center of this dissatisfaction is the question of how much say an individual should have in letting others—even those with legitimate need—look at and use an individual's records. |
|
This paper reviews the accountability regimes of contractarian and communitarian theory. The contractarian theory is further elaborated with the developments of shareholder primacy, the stakeholder theory and team production model (TPM), and the communitarian themes of single constituency, Catholic social thought (CST) and corporate citizenship.
Contractarian theory is rooted in liberalism, where as communitarian theory is a humanist discipline. While contractarians stress the value of competition, liberty and freedom, the communitarians emphasize cooperation, justice and civic responsibility.
The purpose of this analysis is to frame corporate ‘personhood’ in the perspective of the existing theories. This article suggests that corporate citizenship has been revived under Canadian law which contemplates a communitarian corporation.
|
|
Authoritarian versus responsive communitarian bioethics
A communitarian approach to bioethics adds a core value to a field that is often more concerned with considerations of individual autonomy. Some interpretations of liberalism put the needs of the patient over those of the community; authoritarian communitarianism privileges the needs of society over those of the patient.
Responsive communitarianism's main starting point is that we face two conflicting core values, autonomy and the common good, and that neither should be a priori privileged and that we have principles and procedure that can be used to work out this conflict but not to eliminate it. Additionally, it favours changing behaviour mainly through the creation of norms and by drawing on informal social control rather than by coercion.
|
 |
Etzioni wrote The books -
The Limits of Privacy (1999) and
The New Normal (2015).
|
 |
|
|
COMMUNITARIANISM
IS AN IMPERIAL LIE
A FRONT IDEOLOGY
A CENTURY OLD PSEUDO RELIGION
ENTREPRENEURIAL PHILANTHROPY AS A PUBLIC RELATIONS EXERCISE FOR A SLAVERY CARTEL
you can reverse engineer God...
It is The Empire of elitism...The controlled demolition of reason.
and building a resistance movement based on theology is an arm of the Communitarian Fabianist LIE...
Communitarianism splits into 2 distinct factions - national state and global state...both promote obedience to a hive mind as a higher power in "social altruism"
and will merge into a starship troopers neofascist situation. or granny dies. or the planet dies... Obey the system for the good of the planet...scientism & religion merge.
Aldous Huxley would love the popes latest moves...[see below], while many, like Tony Blair, a Fabian...
converted to catholicity...
They are "communitarian charades"...corporatist communitarianism is the new world order.
The corporate global state as politically directed Communitarianism
|
|
|
 |
The REAL religious "Ultra-Right":
The Pope supports the 4th Industrial revolution?
“The present moment offers the world a precious opportunity to guide and govern the transformations associated with the Fourth Industrial Revolution in a way that builds inclusive societies. However, it brings diminished opportunities for employment that also brings with it a responsibility among leaders to create jobs, tackle inequality and help solve society’s complex crisis,” said Pope Francis in his message.
On the risk that the Fourth Industrial revolution poses to labour markets, Pope Francis said: “Clearly there is a need to create new models of doing business that, while promoting the development of advanced technologies, are also capable of using them to create dignified work for all.”
The Pope encouraged leaders to seize the opportunities that the Fourth Industrial Revolution presents:
“The World Economic Forum can become a platform for the defence and protection of creation and for the achievement of a progress which is healthier, more human, more social and more integral.”
The Popes Business plan? Elites & Papal connections?
The Vatican and business come together
It may seem an unusual pairing: big businesses and Pope Francis, a pontiff who has repeatedly criticized capitalism in scathing terms. But they announced a new partnership today, the latest sign of the growing influence of environmental, social and governance, or E.S.G., practices in business.
The Vatican and business come together
Meet the Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican, a group of businesses, investors and other groups that represent $2.1 trillion in market cap and 200 million employees. The group has announced pledges toward environmental and sustainable-business goals that fit into the E.S.G. movement, with Francis’ blessing.
The 27 leaders of the council are known as Guardians for Inclusive Capitalism, and include Ajay Banga of Mastercard, Marc Benioff of Salesforce and Brian Moynihan of Bank of America. They will meet each year with Francis and Cardinal Peter Turkson, who leads the Vatican department dealing with many social issues.
The Vatican and business come together
“An economic system that is fair, trustworthy, and capable of addressing the most profound challenges facing humanity and our planet is urgently needed,” Francis said in a statement.
The Vatican and business come together
The group is the brainchild of Lynn Forester de Rothschild, the businesswoman who has backed ventures to promote so-called inclusive capitalism in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. Among them is Inclusive Capital Partners, an E.S.G.-focused activist hedge fund co-founded with Jeff Ubben.
Pope to hold Cura Foundation event
"We must consider the interplay between mind, body and soul if we hope to build a more equitable health care system and improve human health care globally," "Providing an opportunity for experts from diverse disciplines to have a dialogue and share information and compare perspectives in a dynamic way and in partnership will inspire hope for patients, families and communities around the world. We often describe the conference as Davos but for health care; a multi-disciplinary approach that mobilizes global leaders to examine the world's most pressing health challenges."
Robin Smith, M.D., M.B.A., founder and president of the Cura Foundation.
|
 |
The Cercle Pinay was founded in the early 1950s as an elite clandestine forum to promote the vision of a Catholic and conservative Europe and to oppose the threat of Communism. Shrouded in secrecy, the Cercle brought together statesmen such as Antoine Pinay, Konrad Adenauer, Franz-Josef Strauss, Giulio Andreotti, Otto von Habsburg, Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller, as well as top figures from the American and European intelligence services.
Following the rise of student counter-culture in the 1960s, the Cercle focused on domestic subversion, using its network of propagandists and intelligence operatives to smear progressive politicians such as Willi Brandt, François Mitterrand, Harold Wilson and Jimmy Carter and to promote their favoured candidates: Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, Giscard d’Estaing and Franz-Josef Strauss. Throughout the 1970s, the Cercle also worked to defend apartheid South Africa and Franco’s Spain. After the electoral victory of the Right in 1979-1980, the Cercle targeted peace campaigners and the new Soviet regime under Mikhail Gorbachev, playing a key part in the fall of the Iron Curtain and then ensuring the integration of Eastern Europe into the European Union. David Teacher
|
|
Le Cercle is a secretive, privately-funded, transnational discussion group which regularly meets in different parts of the world. It is attended by a mixture of politicians, ambassadors, bankers, shady businessmen, oil experts, editors, publishers, military officers and intelligence agents, who may or may not have retired from their official functions. The participants come from western or western-oriented countries. Many historical members tend to be affiliated with aristocratic circles in London or obscure elements within the Vatican, and accusations of links to fascism are anything but uncommon in this milieu. The greatest enemy of the Cercle has been the Soviet Union and members have been crusading against communist subversion for many decades. During this process, Cercle members unfortunately have accused almost every nationalist and socialist government, every labour union, every terrorist, and every serious investigator of western intelligence of being in bed with the KGB.
Worse, more than a few of its core members can be linked to the CIA's Cold War "Strategy of Tension", in which underground fascist militias almost certainly were used to carry out "communist" terror campaigns to push countries moving too far to the left back towards the right. Some of these campaigns were extremely bloody and cost a lot of innocent lives. In addition, the Cercle has always been strongly focused on European integration, the efforts of its members going back to the early days of Franco-German rapprochement. The significant presence of Paneuropa-affiliated Opus Dei members and Knights of Malta, together with statements of the Vatican and Otto von Habsburg, clearly indicate that there has been an agenda in the background to some day bring about a new Holy Roman Empire, its borders stretching from the Atlantic to the Black Sea and from the Baltic Sea to North Africa. Interestingly, the latest generation of British Cercle members, whose predecessors were interested in joining the European Union, now do everything in their power to keep Britain out of the emerging European superstate, having lost faith that they can become a significant force within Europe or that the interests of mainland Europe - France in particular - will align with those of Great Britain.
|
|
Making Bilderberg Look Like Amateurs
Its purpose is to subvert the democratic principles and processes of individual countries and are by nature ideologically ‘hawkish’ – distributing propaganda, stoking fear of communist plots from Russia, vote rigging and hacking the accounts of politicians and prominent global figures. Promoting the ‘war on terror’ has been a major factor in their activities of recent years and in so doing broker weapons deals and setting up false flag operations the world over to suit its own agenda. It is reported that ‘Gladio‘ style attacks, much like the clandestine NATO “stay-behind” sabotage, guerrilla warfare and assassination operations in Europe have been conducted along with illegal business operations, financial fraud and arms dealing – all attributed to this group. Meet Le Cercle – |
 |
|
CESNUR
"In the USA, neo-conservative think tanks - dedicated to changing the way the world views itself, through studies on military, cultural, religious and economic issues - have been successfully promoting a mentality based on the justification of inequality and on total freedom of enterprise, as opposed to all other human rights.
Not all think tanks of the new international right, however, come from the US. One of them, for example, comes from Italy. It is called CESNUR, the "Centre for the Study of New Religions".
It puts itself across as a non denominational and non partisan study centre, whereas actually it is a militant organization, which draws its inspiration from a self-styled "counter-revolutionary" ideology.
Although run by Catholic fundamentalists, CESNUR promotes a kind of ecumenism among transnational enterprises which preach global free market; as we can see, CESNUR brings together admirers of the Inquisition and supporters of Scientology, Catholic extremists and esoteric Freemasons." |
The technological singularity is the hypothetical advent of artificial general intelligence theoretically capable of recursive self-improvement, resulting in a runaway effect to an intelligence explosion.[27] Eric Steinhart, a proponent of "Christian transhumanism", argues there is significant overlap of ideas between the secular singularity and Teilhard's religious Omega Point.[4] Steinhart quotes Ray Kurzweil, one of the most prominent singularitarians, who stated that "evolution moves inexorably toward our conception of God, albeit never reaching this ideal."[4][28] Like Kurzweil, Teilhard predicts a period of rapid technological change that results in a merger of humanity and technology. He believes that this marks the birth of the noosphere and the emergence of the "spirit of the Earth", but the Teilhardian Singularity comes later. Unlike Kurzweil, Teilhard's singularity is marked by the evolution of human intelligence reaching a critical point in which humans ascend from "transhuman" to "posthuman". He identifies this with the Christian "parousia".
Wikipedia
The Omega Point
The Omega Point is a supposed future when everything in the universe spirals toward a final point of unification.[1] The term was coined by the French Jesuit Catholic priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881–1955).[2] Teilhard argued that the Omega Point resembles the Christian Logos, namely Christ, who draws all things into himself, who in the words of the Nicene Creed, is "God from God", "Light from Light", "True God from true God", and "through him all things were made".[3] In the Book of Revelation, Christ describes himself thrice as "the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end".
