This site serves as the official external communication vehicle for
the World Governing Council and the Wettin Upper Chamber. If you’ve been
directed here for instruction, note that most messages are
intentionally obscure. Audio files are up to date as of March, 2019 and
underlying messages alternate between Kestrel and Tanager Nodes.
If you have difficulty understanding a particular message, you may
reach out to Luxembourg Cathedral on Node 9 of the Forgotten Frequency.
After authentication you may receive additional instruction. In the
Upper Chamber we often say, “Debate is required, respectful dissent is
allowed, and betrayal is death.” Delegates and Electors must bear this
in mind whilst reading the instructions written herein. By the time
information is posted here, the debate is over and dissent has been
noted.
I wish to begin by sending a warm welcome and glad greetings to all
who’ve begun monitoring or following this website. This is Glamis,
calling to all of you, wherever you may be, hoping that you and yours
are safe and well in this time of anxious unrest. It is my sincerest
hope that I may convey some measure of comfort, though we are far from
victory in either of our most recent endeavors.
Over the past several months, we’ve received many, many messages from
our new audience, and this site has had hundreds of thousands of
visitors. WGC staff now reads all comments posted to this blog and
contrary to the way it may appear, none are ever deleted. Only those
that we specifically approve for publication are visible to the general
public but rest assured, if you have offered a comment, it is still
there. Some that have been approved for publication have been responded
to by members of my staff while others remain in queue and will be
addressed in a more thoughtful post that I’ll be making soon. On behalf
of my staff, I thank you for your thoughtful input.
My outreach planning has been significantly delayed by the onset of
the worldwide Coronavirus outbreak, which has occupied much of our
resources. Along those lines, and in response to the many questions you
have posted on the subject, I’d like to say a few things related to the
pandemic:
1. This pandemic is real, it’s not a false flag. If you haven’t
personally been affected, chances are someone you know has been. I lost
family to the disease early on in the course of the pandemic, when Italy
was hit very hard, so I know, somewhat first-hand how devastating this
virus can be.
2. It won’t last forever. My personal belief is that by the end of
August, the rate of new infections will have slowed to the point where
it will be safe to travel by air and gather together again with loved
ones. That’s not a prediction, just my strong feeling.
3. Based on our research, I believe the virus was inadvertently
released from a lab in China into the population due to poor control
protocols. Having done a pretty thorough investigation into the genetic
origins of the virus, it appears to bear all the hallmarks of a
naturally evolved virus and it does not appear to bear the hallmarks of
an engineered, weaponized virus. Here’s the chilling truth: An
intentionally-engineered virus would likely have killed a much larger
segment of the world’s population because the attack/grasp and penetrate
mechanism of this virus isn’t as effective as it might have been. The
new virus is horrible and deadly, but not as deadly as others I have
seen that were specifically designed for mass destruction. When I have
this conversation with friends, colleagues and family, the first
question that always arises is, “If this virus came from nature, why was
it in a Chinese lab?” The answer is that many research centers have
live viruses and other nasty things in their laboratories. Usually the
purpose is to study various biological attack mechanisms and then try to
design defence agents. If there’s any kind of silver lining, it may be
that this pandemic, horrible as it is, will move us to develop a broad
spectrum antiviral, which might save us from a potentially more lethal
virus at some point in the future.
This is important to know because living with the ravages of this
pandemic is bad enough without having to fear that someone, somewhere is
intentionally targeting us. I know that due to the evil behaviour we’ve
seen from so many of those in power, many of you are beyond trusting,
and you’ve come to believe that every natural disaster, every illness
and every tragedy is intentionally designed to target humanity. Indeed,
some of the comments left on this site specifically accuse me of leading
a worldwide conspiracy to destroy all that is good. I’ve seen enough
evil in my life that I can empathize with those who no longer trust, so I
won’t try to dissuade you. It’s ok if you don’t trust me, or the media
or your elected officials. I sincerely ask you though, as a fellow
sentient being, please do not lose hope. Please consider that there has
always been a struggle between those who wish to control and harm and
those who wish to live in peace, but today, more of us are aware that
it’s a struggle.
Within the past hundred years we’ve seen the rise of totalitarianism
in various forms, and though Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot are gone, the
struggle continues. But please consider this: The fact that some
choose to fight against totalitarianism means that some have not been
corrupted, and while there is struggle, there is hope.
Cities on Fire
Subsequent to our first encounters a few months ago, my staff
promised to be as forthcoming as possible in responding to your queries,
particularly within the context of current events and world governance.
Indeed, in the wake of those earlier encounters, we’ve engaged in some
brief, though I hope, meaningful dialogue.
In light of that promise, I’d like you to consider the civil unrest
playing out in various places throughout the world, but particularly
within the larger cities of the United States. The World Governing
Council has been collecting intelligence on these activities through a
variety of methods. We are specifically prohibited by our own chamber
rules from taking any action within the United States, where such action
might interfere with, or conflict with the rights established by the US
Constitution. In another post I’ll provide more information regarding
our relationship with the United States. For our purposes here, it’s
sufficient to state that we are working with US authorities to track
individuals believed to be involved in the financing of activities such
as human trafficking and the funding of professional provocateurs. Here
are a few questions to consider:
When you watch live coverage of protests, you will see that the
majority of protestors are dressed in regular street clothes, no gas
mask, no backpack. They are walking together with others who are
similarly dressed. They may be chanting or carrying signs, but they
appear to be regular people “from the neighborhood.” From our
experience, which includes members of my staff who have attended many of
these protests to observe the situation on the ground, people in this
first group are hurting. They are frightened and they are sincerely
asking for a change in police governance. They are grieving, and whether
one agrees with all of their positions or not, we respect them as
feeling, searching people and we hope they find comfort. On the other
hand, you will also notice, especially after night falls, there are a
few individuals dressed all in black with matching backpacks, armed with
rocks or bricks, and sometimes even wearing gas masks. If you were to
attempt to engage them in conversation, they respond with slogans and
venom.
Why have we seen the same individuals from the second group in Seattle and Los Angeles on different days?
Why do people from the first group say to people from the second
group, “You need to get out of here, you’re going to get us all killed!”
If the people from group 2 are traveling around the US as “professional insurgents,” who is paying for their airfare?
Why do pallets of bricks appear in front of businesses when the
business owner didn’t order them? Who paid for the bricks and the
delivery?
In the United States, whose interests are better served if the economy deteriorates even further?
In the spirit of transparency, I’d like to share with you the
attached document, which was delivered by hand to the intended recipient
on May 31.
Note: You may not be familiar with Mr. MacLeod, but decoders will prevail.
Until the next time, may God be with you and protect you always.
This message is from Tessa-Lynne Gordy, Chief of Staff at World Governing Council.
Dear Misty, please do not take our lack of response as a sign of disrespect or that we do not appreciate your comments.
This site has not, at least traditionally, been monitored for
comments as the general public has not been our audience. That being
said, due to the significant interest and comments from people who are
sincerely searching for answers in a complex word, we acknowledge that
we are tardy in responding to those who have reached out. While we can’t
respond individually to each comment, we’ve begun discussions at our
facilities in Luxembourg City and at SHAPE (in Belgium) about keeping
the GlamisCalling site open and issuing some posts related to common
questions and comments from the public. Misty, your communication struck
a chord with one of our Tower Communication Operators who escalated it
to his manager who in turn passed it along to me.
Please understand this is new for us and since what we’ve generally
been referring to as “the awakening,” we recognize that we’ve entered
uncharted territory. Based on data elements gleaned from some of our
newly implemented technology we did in fact believe that we would soon
find ourselves in a position where we might actually interact with
members of the general public, but this eventuality happened sooner than
we predicted and though the interaction has largely been with those who
are of like mind, nevertheless our fundamental lack of preparedness for
such interactions leave us in a position where we’re sort of “building
the airplane while in flight.”
Managing communications in the wake of increased public awareness and
the scrutiny that comes with it is a new chapter that we must undertake
with care and love. We are honored and humbled that you have chosen to
reach out to us. Although I myself am relatively new to the Council, the
work done here has been performed in obscurity for a thousand years.
Our predecessors of even a hundred years ago could not have imagined
anything resembling this degree of public awareness or the enlightenment
that informs your approach to, and interest in world governance. We,
who are more accustomed to working in the dark, must tread lightly into a
more public arena, but we understand we must enter that arena as
part of our commitment to ethical stewardship.
We apologize for the lateness of this message and we ask your
patience as we navigate these new waters. I speak on behalf of Council
leadership when I say please know you are in our hearts and we are
grateful for the opportunity to interact.
On a related note, please also forgive any errors in this
communication. Normally all outgoing posts are vetted and proof-read,
but after Misty’s note was sent to me for review, I and my colleagues
agreed a prompt response was more important than a grammatically correct
one.
Let us, for a moment, speak plainly, for it is not often, in these
turbulent times when we can speak openly about such things. Likely, the
time will come again, soon, when we will move back to the shadows, for
there is yet much work to do. For now though, many are awake and
listening, so we may continue our exchange openly. Your adversaries will
not understand, and even if they read, the words will be meaningless to
them.
In these last few years you have awakened. You have risen up and
created great change and you have resisted tyranny. You have tuned in
and your vibratory frequencies have become heightened.
Make no mistake though. The change did not make YOU. Rather, YOU made the change.
Recently, a lovely angel said, “Do they know we’ve learned to decode?”
Yes, you have. It’s quite evident that you’ve become proficient at solving puzzles.
But please remember: Your strength is not in solving puzzles. Your
greatest strength may be your love of all that is good, your love of
freedom and your inherent belief that tomorrow will be better than
yesterday.
By contrast, the greatest weakness of your adversaries is that they
have lost the ability to love anything outside of themselves. In their
hubris they are asleep, and asleep. they have no awareness whatsoever
that their habitat is receding. Swamp striders asleep, and rendered deaf
by their own spell.
And meanwhile, more judges are appointed. While swamp striders hiss
and yowl at every tweet, they are blind to the good that prevails. Your
advocate is a great distractor, and your adversaries are very easily
distracted.
System integrity review is complete. Queue Capricorn uploads on
Arundel Frequency Geronimo node and relay to Cathedral. Relay with
slide-com to Rogers Dry Lake and provide over-watch for Durango Jubilee
Tesla.
Glamis Calling is undergoing upgrades to align with VibeSat
capabilities. Throughout the remainder of 2019, communications from the
Upper Chamber will be delivered via bio-chips or through alternative,
non-secure media. Set personal devices and align vibrational frequencies
according to previous instructions and contact Luxembourg Cathedral on
Forgotten Frequency using Hyacinth pattern on Node 9. Keep the
aspidistra flying.
We require a reboot of Grand Guardian with a full platform
engagement. The Shadow Lion is in place to watch over systems during
reboot. Proceed at once and direct questions to Cathedral on Hyacinth
node of Forgotten Frequency.
The Upper Chamber supports the right of a private company to
implement rules of conduct related to religious symbology. It is the
position of the Upper Chamber that an internal rule, established by a
firm, which prohibits the visible wearing of any political,
philosophical or religious sign does not constitute discrimination. That shall be the Court’s ruling.
The Upper Chamber strongly supports the South Korean Parliament’s
position on the impeachment of Park Geun-hye. Judges must ensure their
ruling reflects Wettin’s position on the matter.