CHAPTER 07 : THE CONSPIRACY OF SCIENCE
[back]

It would be fair to say that for the last hundred years, the human race has not made any progress in the understanding of life and the Cosmos. Whereas technology, which has greatly improved our understanding of the particle physics that runs it all, has remained paradox ridden and incomplete. Thus far, it is only by the greatest bit of luck that the buffoons thankfully haven't succeeded in completing a black hole of any magnitude in the lab.

The Teutonic eggheads of post World War II made the Germanic contribution to science legendary, and the popular understanding of the mad scientific genius always has a German accent: Einstein, Von Neumann, Heisenberg, Max Plank, etc. The only problem with this myth is that it is a load of old baloney.

Einstein and the establishment agreed in the late 1930's, in Copenhagen, that having a paradox at the heart of physics was a good idea. Also, that the speed of light should be fixed at a constant and that there was no ether or grainy bits in space that would hold things up. An entire century of human evolution has been lost by that nonsense.

Did you know that the reason why the sky isn't white at night is a real paradox and mystery? Because if Albert Einstein and cronies have rationally decided, that there is nothing holding the passage of light through the cosmos up (i.e. that there is no ether), then they would also expect the sky to be completely white at night. The dark night sky disproves Einstein's Theory of Relativity.

We know the sky is black at night and that was the paradox noted by Olber in 1920. Something is holding up the light to make it dark, and that whole paradox is really proof for the ether that Einstein wanted so badly to ignore.

Of course people will answer to Olber that the Universe has been measured finite - but how could we ever rationally say that when we have never measured the Dark Matter within it.

We build TVs and computers or any other black box, yet our understanding of the vital processes at the heart of it all is actually less than nothing. If we look closely---and we have to (because no one wants to admit it to you)---there are paradoxes not just at the heart of physics, but at the heart of everything we think we know about the universe.

Our logic isn't logical, our philosophy of arithmetic is about nothing in particular, and our physics is an ignorant tragedy. The odd thing is that the thirty or so really crippling paradoxes are all really the very same one, but just dressed up differently in the specialist language of each discipline. That is, every paradox could be solved by taking into account its interaction with the bigger picture. The very opposite of how every scientist today has been trained to think.

Coming back to physics and cosmology, (because we have to. . .well somebody does anyway) our particle physics today is a gargantuan monstrosity of mathematical nonsense that will never produce any results. It's called super-strings, and at the heart of all the real problems of 21st century academic physics, is the in-built failure of Einstein and his theories of relativity.

How much nonsense and social engineering has been written on the back of the mathematical nonsense and paradoxes in physics? The nonsense of quantum physics is being used to justify all sort of impulsive and irrational social leaps and experiments. Whole theories of human behavior and the occult are based upon these foundations of sand.

Let's be clear, though, about what I'm saying. Yes, there is plenty of scientific evidence and results to talk about particles and show what particles can do. But current quantum physics and super-strings is a model or a construct. It is a vehicle on which to drive forward; it is a frame on which to hang the experimental results. There are better frames and better vehicles. However, what quality of vehicle are we talking about when we talk of quantum physics? The answer has to be a unicycle.

In comparison, the amount of Rolls Royce genius that has been repetitively ignored for at least the past hundred years by the establishment, has been criminal. We had Maxwell in the 19th Century, Tesla and Brown in the early 20th Century and De Palma in the 1990's. Also, a whole gaggle of others; all these people knew how physics really worked and how to tap into the really free energy of the cosmos in addition to interplanetary space travel. Of course, this was all against the wishes of the Einsteinian theorists and the oil companies.

But, if you thought that the problem was a modern one, well have I got news for you. Having developed and rediscovered Tesla's Theory of Environmental Energy [1938] and how free energy works, I studied and studied the principles of philosophy of science, and developed a new scientific world-view. I found ways to argue in philosophy that could educate modern scientific thinkers away from the paradoxes by using the same jargon that they use, but in a different way.

I was trying to get them to adopt a 'holistic' approach. Boy, what a waste of ten years that was. The cosmos runs on harmony, resonance, musical scales, the mathematics of wave theory and 'eightness'. It is definitely not a coincidence that the Chinese I CHING symbolism is made up like it is, for that is exactly the same symbolism used inside every modern computer chip.

So, there is the look of real antiquity about this truth, but it gets worse. Having been an avid follower of the Chaos Theory (coming out of the Santa Fe Institute), I noticed that one of the fundamental natural laws that seemed to underpin the cosmos (that nobody wanted to talk about), was 'emergence'.

That 'order emerges out of chaos' was being proved on the Santa Fe computers, and some conspiracy buffs will tell you that it is also part of the motto of a very high Masonic degree. This was the one connection no scientist was trained to ever want, yet it was the key to understanding everything: unity, Tesla, time-travel, anti-gravity, possibly even the soul and eternal life. It was the very cornerstone of reality.

More shocks lay ahead for me, however. Taking a rummage through a dusty old cupboard in the Edinburgh Theosophical Society one day, I found this bundle of yellowed paper (dated 1920) with instructions to destroy in the event of the owner's death. It was an esoteric secret school Illuminati Degree. I opened up the bundle with glee, but discovered to my horror (well, it was for my ego), that in those pages was the theory that I thought I had invented; the theory of 'emergence,' 'threeness' and harmony, based on Hindu and Sanskrit writings dating back 10,000 BC.

As we all know, there is nothing new about real truth, but the Illuminati Schools have been teaching the reality of science, free energy and emergence to people for millennia. The Platonic school's harmonic math briefly emerged into art schools during the renaissance, but it never made it into science and technology. If it had, we could all have been flying anti-gravity machines in the 16th century---much like the technical designs of the Vimanas of the ancient Hindus, which were preserved in caves written on palm leaves. Presumably, after some cataclysmic earth change thousands of years BC, that may have sunk what we think of as Atlantis.

The same theories written in Sanskrit have been re-invented time and time again by bright human scholars. The recent spate of really, (obviously) good theorists have come to grief looking for peer acceptance and publication. People like Peter Plichta, Ray Tomes and myself have tried till we're blue in the face to get scientists to see sense and save the world with sanity.

Many of us today are beguiled by the technological advances of genetics and computers, maybe even satisfied that the pace of medicine is just about holding back the tide of new super bugs. Many of us are happy to listen to the great mathematician, Stephen Hawking, speculating badly that the unity will come to physics in twenty years. We all know that's a pretty safe thing to say because we may have been hit by earth changes before then, and any cronies perpetuating the science conspiracy, will have passed over before then, anyway.

The reality of the matter, though, is that the crop of modern science gurus like Hawking and Dawkins do not give us the truth. Whether they know the truth and are hiding it from us is another story. If they were hiding this, they would be criminals of civilization, stifling the young minds that could save our planet. However, maybe the basis of the matter is that they are merely victims.

The new theorists like Plichta, Tomes, Brown, and myself who have come forward, can argue the most profound and real scientific arguments, using the highest form of scientific language and analysis and are willing to be proved wrong. We satisfy all the criteria for good science: simplicity and prediction, which is more than can be said for rubbish theories like the 'big bang' and super-strings.

Where, oh where, did we hear that good science is so difficult that it needs incredible hyper-dimensional mathematics and the infliction of restrictive disability, to even have the time and inclination to contemplate the complexities? It is just not true that reality is ultra complex. Thousands of scientists, millions of hours, billions of dollars have been spent, yet no results, no progress has been forthcoming---just a beckoning dark age and a good mortgage. Those big black holes in our current scientific understanding are starting to be filled by dark gods and black magic.

Weird scientific Masons are starting to insert Lucifer into their meaningless equations to have them make any kind of sense (Scientific and Medical Network). A dark age of barbarism and insanity is only a few scientific confessions away.

Publicly, we may yet see some scientific scholars in the magical robes of alchemy and they might cite Newton as their paragon of magic and gravity. He was also an alchemist and Rosicrucian, but certainly not one to have published all of the truth or to have been permitted to do so.

The other problem with making change is that science is really a masculine preserve and that left brained emperor is hardly going to concede that he is not the proprietor of reason. But that's another problem, that of proving things like UFOs and free energy to so called skeptics is a nonsensical pursuit.

One could present them with a 'falsification' or proof and they would not change their point of view. In science, the very cornerstone doctrine of reasoning (again by a Germanic philosopher scientist called Karl Popper), says that you only need one proof and then the skeptic must concede the possibility of what you are talking about.

All over the world, proofs are being presented and nobody wants to learn of it. Perhaps in secret, the world's top Masonic scientists could save the world with free energy, using some of the most ancient knowledge on this planet. Perhaps those scientists who tried to make this difference, but died young, (like Bruce De Palma) will one day be acknowledged as heroes. Let us hope that there is still a tiny fraction of time left for the masses on this planet to know truth . Let us also pray that the 'Elite Master Plan' to cull the ignorant, helpless and poisoned in mind and body fails. In any event, the secret of time-travel, dimensional-travel and all the free energy you can use may be simply garnered with the spin of a magnetic disk. But be forewarned, every attempt carries a government death warning.

If you want to scientifically test the basis of telepathy, harmony of the spheres and the very nature of the cosmos, get two acoustic guitars, tune them up and set them so that they face each other. Strum one guitar and you will notice that the other guitar starts to resonate in harmony.

If you want to understand how it is that free energy is only a phone call away, think of a hydroelectric dam. The universe is full of ether and subatomic particles all buzzing about and bubbling out all over the place. They are very chaotic and it is a natural law that out of that swirling vortex, order emerges. Just like the red spot on the planet Jupiter.

The planetary super storm on Jupiter has a red eye that looks solid and stable. In fact, the particles of the cosmos are all like eyes in the energy storms of the cosmos. All of that activity exerts its own pressure on the fabric of the cosmos, and like the waters of a hydroelectric dam, they have a pressure against the wall.

When we spin an electromagnetic plate to get free energy as De Palma, Brown and numerous others have done, it is like opening up a sluice in the dam and the weight of energy pours through, driving our turbine.

If you have ever wondered what it would be like to solve the most difficult paradox ever known to the minds of the world's greatest physicists, let's give it a try and see how easy this is. Scientists cannot figure out whether a particle is a particle or a wave. As far as they are concerned, it cannot be both.

It is both, however. But, the real question is: What is a particle? Is it a billiard ball or do we need a more holistic explanation that says that every particle is part of something much bigger?

That insight would actually help solve the paradox and stop silly physicists from saying that particles are telepathic. There is little danger that scientists---who are trained reductionists---will make that connection, though. Particles really emerge like notes out of the endlessly playing chaotic symphony.

The chaotic vortex of small and big particles that make up the cosmos is constant, like an orchestra playing an eternal symphony. But, it is an orchestra that we cannot technically see, thus far. Out of this orchestral symphony, ordered notes continually emerge, like the red spot of Jupiter---order emerging out of chaos, waves of particles like waves of music.

Particles are waves and it is only a paradox if we think that a particle is a finished article, something that is a completely isolated end product, like a snooker ball. A reductionist scientist today only sees the snooker ball.

The reality is that a particle is like a musical note that is continually being played by a violinist, and it can change and become something else under the right conditions.

Nicola Tesla also saw this, and his Theory of Environmental Energy was confiscated by the U.S. government. Our snooker ball could become a tennis ball.

Outrageous idea, but really very organic and sensible. All of today's experimental results in physics have reference to 'threeness', 'eightness' and have harmony in it. But that never seems to lead to a simpler understanding of the Cosmos. We seem to keep getting sillier with our mathematics, never down to basic harmony and chaos. It's always something bizarre and complex.

The scientific mindset of reductionism strips away all the complexities and leads us away from holistic systems; it gives us snooker balls and little disintegrated components that we can pick up with tweezers. Of course, this has led to paradoxes everywhere simply because things are actually so interconnected.

The contradiction is that reductionism never made a simple job out of particle physics. Our very understanding of time and the cosmos is, in reality, nonsense. Science fiction programs like Star Trek serve to reinforce the idea that we have to get past the impossible 'faster than light barrier' to traverse the cosmos.

"If you're at warp Factor 10, you can't go any faster", and as chief engineer Scott said to Captain Kirk - "you cannot change the laws of physics" - at least as far as current science is concerned . This is all baloney as well. An understanding of the time, matter and gravity concepts (on the lips of abductees and 'Black Ops' scientists like Dr. Michael Wolf and the basics of the Secret Science) show us that gravity, time and mass are all one and the same. In all likelihood, it is easier to travel through time and dimensions by spinning a magnetic disk, than it is to travel between distant galaxies with never to be found 'dilithium crystals'.

One of the main features of interstellar travel (that was seemingly disclosed by ETs), is that they pull their destination to themselves. This doesn't sound like Star Trek does it? This is how it probably works: by taking their ships out of gravity (and therefore time) and the physical conditions of this dimension (by getting on a high mountain top of free energy), their destination seems to swirl closer towards them because distant things look closer together, i.e. city blocks look very close together from earth's orbit. Then, they then drop more easily onto their destination, with the minimum of physical adjustment, but using the maximum of free energy.

Right now on this planet---and make no mistake about it--- what passes for science is a perpetuated conspiracy of ignorance.

Everywhere on the internet, the glories of technology are being propounded; even the completion of the Human Genome Project wasn't an act of analytical genius. It was simply a case of funding enough monkeys, typewriters and petri dishes.

Science itself has turned into an irrefutable priesthood with popes like Hawking at its head---doctrines that cannot be overturned and reality that cannot be published. As the 21st Century progresses, more and more minds are being led into darkness.

Scholastic education at universities, schools and colleges discourage individual brilliance and teach people to become conduits of vast amounts of data. Unfortunately, most of that data is junk. Philosophy departments are either closed down or converted into schools of atheism or nihilism with spartan ethics and elitist overtones. Everywhere, the skills of analysis are being discouraged and disowned, while the plans of the social engineers (that steer the new generations to their doom) take shape.

Like deja vu, we have seen these plans unfold before during the industrial revolution and 'dark Satanic mills' of England. There, in vile working conditions, the slaves of capitalism were chained to the production and assembly lines, no one ever knowing how it all worked. It's the same in the 21st Century. The capital of truth and information falls into 'total compartmentalization', without anyone ever knowing the whole truth.

Today, science is used against the masses; it has become the slave of politics and multi-nationals. To avoid introducing a tax on industrial carbon emissions, one group of scientists, working for the UK Thatcher Government, pronounced that there was no such thing as global warming.

To save money on cattle feed production, scientists pronounced it safe to lower the sterilization temperatures of the feed process---this, as a prelude to the CJD epidemic of 'Mad Cow Disease'.

Now the Nazi theories of eugenics once again come to the fore publicly, as the newly cracked genetic codes of the population offer multinationals more ways to tax and exploit the population through insurance, health, education and social engineering scams.

Unfortunately, the same short-sighted science that gave us bad disconnected physics, will be applied to the science of genetics. With what results? Everything will be taken out of context, and at some point, someone will invent a new paradox to explain why seemingly ordinary genes can make extraordinary people.

Scientists like Hawking continue to promote Darwin, probably knowing it's all a lie. Richard Dawkins' book, 'Climbing Mount Improbable,' tells us of the slow painstaking climb involved in the evolution of the complex organ of the eye and how the human race acquired it after millions of years of painstaking evolution.

His Cambridge compatriot biologist, Brian Goodwin, however, tells us that the eye is an organ which can spontaneously evolve or devolve at will (in a flash in an instant), and has models to prove that. In other words, the eye emerges spontaneously to fill the need; it doesn't take millions of years of improbability and slow Darwinism.

Meanwhile, proponents of catastrophe continue to prepare the population for imminent disaster and earth changes. Why? Because recently, science finally accepted the possibility of sudden global problems. In the blink or evolution of an eye, the earth's crust can flip, and mountains, valleys and oceans have a real need to swap places. It's happened before and it will happen again.

Even the Dropa People (the race of crashed ETs that left their records in caves in the Himalayas, found and deciphered by Chinese officials), tell of impending global disaster. But Hollywood's meteorites and Walt Disney's dinosaurs and news releases of sunken lands and coastline changes, heighten our awareness of sudden change.

What makes the onset of natural disasters like this a conspiracy? It is the fact that governments know when it's going to happen, and allegedly do not have the technology to prevent it or save their populations. They need a scapegoat so enter the X-Files conspiracy. In 1947, hordes of little gray men from 'somewhere far away' made a deal with the nice US government to give us technology in exchange for the DNA of some nice 'white women'. But those darn critters went overboard and supplied stuff that didn't work, so now we have to depend on NASA and the petrol engine to save the day.

But! Sorry folks, there isn't enough petrol around to get all 6 billion people off this planet.

First, these beings (called greys) have been around since the dawn of recorded history, and secondly, they are not the ETs who are in charge of the human race, nor the ones who are keeping us ignorant and culled. Secondly (as we have already discovered), the technologies and scientific theories to save the human race have been around and taught secretly here for millennia.

It was interesting to note, in the John Travolta film "Battlefield Earth" (from the book by Scientology guru L. Ron Hubbard), that the human hero was taken by the giant all conquering Chief of the Master Race, to the destroyed Washington Library of Congress. He was given free reign to read anything he wanted - science, engineering and philosophy, because it was all useless and couldn't save him.

Whatever, or whoever is left in this desert of ignorance after any disaster occurs, faces a future without truth or reality. They will no doubt be implanted zombies with no concept of mother or father (and probably with no need for compassion or knowledge). If science cannot mend its ways and serve truth, we should at least have the knowledge that science as a philosophical practice is dead. As a tool of rational inquiry, it is redundant. In its place, a new order is born---not of the scientist, but of the technologist. For it is technology that will control, deaden and manipulate the originality and truths of the future. Technology and the technologists will simply become the controlling tentacles of the governments and multinational corporations.

Ironically, perhaps it will be the survivors, the peoples of the future, who will begin again by making their own measurements of the monoliths of antiquity, the eons old ziggurats. But a better scenario than that would be a setting where we were not so habitually programmed to sit in front of the television day after day, etc. Instead, we would realize that nature itself is an encyclopedia of wisdom from which to draw analogies that will solve many problems.

The power of analogy can help us model the unknown. For example, It can give us a real clarity on eternity and dimensions. In the heavy dark masses of matter and time that we wade through (temporarily divorced from the eternal wellspring of energies and youth), we are like deep-sea divers at the bottom of a weighty gravity ocean. Our life force comes in packets of food, like bottled oxygen; our movements are slow and cumbersome, our outlook, murky.

If we run out of food or oxygen, we run out of life force.

However, by analogy, eternity---dry land without the cumbersome diving suit of our physical body---must have sunshine, oxygen and life force aplenty, without restriction. The power of analogy can save the world ; it can solve problems and break down communication barriers, yet it is not a taught discipline.

The population is not being allowed to analyze or analogize, or basically, to think. The 'science conspiracy' has wasted the potential of generations of young able minds. But, worse than that, it has exposed the human race to the possibility of extinction. To find the responsible parties we must make a brief foray into the non-science of astrology. All of the astrological signs actually correspond to stellar constellations and clusters. There is a secret Thirteenth Sign in astrology called the Red Serpent or Ophiucus, named after the Greek serpent god of medicine. It also points to a constellation---the constellation of Serpens.

You may find that the Serpens Constellation is the standard horizon of some astronomical charts, that everything is plus or minus in relation to that Constellation; a great honor for a great Reptile.

It may be that what we know of as science descends into nonsensical hocus pocus. Yet, it may be that the truth of the ancients, that of alchemy, white, mono-atomic, gold giving energy, rejuvenation and eternal life is in fact true---that the ancients ate it after converting the more base gold into that state.

We hear it can change the world, can cure all, etc. If that's the case, then don't build up your expectations.

Whatever truths come upon us; whatever future we have in store, we must gear ourselves up for a change of perspective. we have been exposed to the nonsense of science for such a long time, that it will be a hard effort to replace what "we think we know" with reality. The Conspiracy has seen to that.
__________________________

[back]