by Captain Wardrobe, July 2020
The Washington Examiner reported that
WHO admits China never reported the existence of coronavirus outbreak
The politicization of a managed disaster
Ask yourself why the WHO would lie & say first reports of the Amazo Virus came from China?
flashback to April 2020;
“The first report came from Wuhan, from China itself, so Taiwan was only asking for clarification, and as some people were claiming, Taiwan didn't report any human-to-human transmission; this has to be clear, So, the report first came from China — that's fact number one — from Wuhan itself.”
- WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
now we see that the timeline on the WHO website itself has been altered;?
"The WHO quietly updated its “Timeline of WHO’s response to COVID-19” on Tuesday following the House Foreign Affairs Committee Republicans' mid-June Interim Report on Origins of COVID-19 Pandemic (led by ranking member and China task force Chairman Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas), which concluded that “despite public reporting to the contrary ... China never notified the WHO about the outbreak in Wuhan.”
This Washington Examiner article is obviously trying to help the China Task Force [no doubt a neocon think tanks] as it stirs up a hawkish rhetoric against China [a totalitarian state, no doubt]
see;
The week
Is what we are seeing here a platforming of a political central issue...which sees the Washington Examiner basically become a public relations exercise for the Neocon hawks as we have seen in the propaganda media blitz in the build up to Iraq / Syria wars?
Is this article designed to deflect against WHO shenanigans similar to those we have witnessed during the previous H5N1 outbreaks of Avian & Swine flu?
here's another quote;
"WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus sought to downplay the early warnings about the outbreak that Taiwan says it provided to the organization and stressed that the "first report" came from Wuhan, where the outbreak is believed to have originated. "
So, after a major pandemic drill in 2019 called Event 201 - which involved the WHO, John Hopkins, The Bill & Melinda Gates foundation and various members of the World Economic Forum - which apparently prepared the powers that be - those who command the NGOs, powerful members of Governments, media & health response teams to an unprecedented pandemic.
We are told that the WHO are in league with China over hiding early data.
This does not come as any great surprise, as we have seen the Neocons & their allies flaut U.N regulations many times before. Previously the Trump regime have accused the WHO of being Chinas mouthpiece, which famously led to Trump announcing a cut of funding to the U.N body.
Are the WHO amplifying a coronavirus into a global disaster?
Is it an attack on the west? if so - why would all western nations Lockdown their populations in complete complicity? Do America & the U.K have a history of blindly obeying the U.N now, after going against it during the run up to the Iraq invasion? hmm
I suggest what we are witnessing is the weaponization of massively conflicting information as a Psy-war against the human population, leaving us helpless as we try to get to the truth through the fog of a promulgated cognitive dissonance.
One has to also remember it is Election year in the USA.
Interestingly the Lockdown restrictions have seen near schizophrenic reactions from western nations. Notably the initial Lockdown protesters were lampooned. Stereotyped as largely selfish, dangerous, right wing reactionary response to business closures by 'anti vaxxers' who promulgate conspiracy theories about the WHO & Bill Gates.
On the 25th May the blatent murderous act of 4 Policemen in Minneapolis seemed to tip the balance. Several murders of black residents noticably Breonna Taylor on March 13th saw protests mounted locally. The timing of the release of the information regarding phone calls made by Breonne Taylors boyfriend after the initial assault by officers is suspicious. George Floyd was murdered , and then extra information was released on the incident which sparked the initial protests on the 28th May. The protests spiralled into a global reaction of outrage, spurred on by the subsequent police shooting of David McAtee in Louisville during these protests on June 1.
This in turn provided many questions for those questioning the reasons for enforcing the Lockdown narrative. Curfews were broken - but this time - it seemed that the pandemic dangers were sidelined. Black Lives Matters Democratic party funding was questioned & AntiFa continued to be rhetoric-ed as a de facto paramilitary movement with a military structure & objectives by the right.
The victimisation of the supposed 'right wing' lockdown protesters could be seen as an enforcement of victimhood in a voter encatchment zone giving Republican voters a resentment that could be useful in the polling stations. Similarly as we have seen in the formation of the Capital Hill Autonomous Zone. It has to be suggested perhaps this was a kind of reward by given by left wing leaders to those voters who may be empowered by supporting democratic candidates.
Indeed rather than trying to enlist a huge western army of willing conscripts, ready to fight a new world war, we may be seeing an attempt to anger the capitalist nations populist populations via lockdown restrictions as an attack on their 'way of life' in an attempt to forge consent in any military action against China. Conversley we may be seeing the Democratic Party trying to build a voter block to utilise steered, astroturfed liberation movements.