What is the 'pingdemic'? Meaning of the term - and why the NHS Covid app forced many to self-isolate High numbers of people being 'pinged' has led to concerns over staff shortages By Alina Polianskaya - July 25, 2021 'Freedom day' arrived in England this week, bringing with it an end to most restrictions on social contact. But as the rules are eased, some fear that a "pingdemic" could lead to "chaos", due to large numbers of people being told to self-isolate through the NHS app leading to staff shortages and business closures. Here's what the term means and what the rules around self-isolation are. The freshest exclusives and sharpest analysis, curated for your inbox What is the 'pingdemic'? The phrase is a play on words made up of the terms "pandemic" and "ping". It refers to being notified by the NHS Covid-19 app on your phone. When you are "pinged" by the app, you are advised to self-isolate for a set amount of time. The notification is sent after the app registers that you have been close contact with someone who has tested positive with Covid-19. The number of people being "pinged" by the app has risen sharply over recent weeks, causing difficulties for some industries as large numbers of staff are having to stay at home and self-isolate. Most commonly, those who are pinged will have to isolate for 10 days, though this can be longer if the person goes on to develop symptoms themselves. Why has the 'pingdemic' caused so much trouble? The number of Covid-19 cases reported in the UK has been rising sharply in recent weeks. As a result, so has the number of people being "pinged".

Government figures confirmed more than 48,000 Covid-19 cases on Sunday 18 July. More than half a million people were "pinged" by the app in the week up to 7 July. This has resulted in staff shortages and disruption in industries where people cannot easily work from home, including in supermarkets and on transport networks. Many businesses are worried that the situation could become even worse now that social distancing rules have been scrapped, with even more people being advised to self-isolate. Richard Walker, managing director of Iceland, said: "We are in the unprecedented position of having to close stores due to staff absences - not because of Covid-19, but because of a broken and disruptive Track and Trace app. "Staff absences rose by 50 per cent last week and the trend is sharp and quick, not just affecting our own colleagues but those throughout our supply chains and logistics networks." He called for an "overhaul of the rules around the Test and Trace app, ideally switching to a 'Test and Release' model". Steve Rowe, the chief executive of Marks & Spencer, told The Times that staff having to self-isolate in large numbers was a "major issue across every industry at the moment", and warned it could lead to reduced hours or supply chain issues. He told the outlet: "Our Covid cases are roughly doubling every week and the pinging level is about three to one of Covid cases, so we're seeing that growing exponentially." The transport network is also at risk of the consequences of staff absences, some have warned. The Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union said the closure of the Metropolitan Line on the London Underground network on Saturday 17 July due to key staff self-isolating indicated that the transport services were "on a knife edge". General secretary Mick Lynch told the PA news agency: "Many rail, bus and Tube services are already seriously understaffed which leaves them dangerously exposed. He added that "freedom day could very easily collapse into chaos day". Frontline NHS staff in England who are fully vaccinated will, in "exceptional circumstances", be permitted to carry on working if they are "pinged" by the Covid contact tracing app after concerns over staff shortages. The Prime Minister is currently self-isolating after he and Chancellor Rishi Sunak were "pinged" by NHS Test and Trace following contact with Health Secretary Sajid Javid, who has tested positive for Covid-19. Boris Johnson and Mr Sunak initially tried to get around the requirement to quarantine by saying they would join a daily workplace testing programme being trialled by the Cabinet Office. However they made a hasty U-turn and said they would in fact be self-isolating after all. When will the rules around self-isolation for close contacts change? The rules around self-isolation are set to change from 16 August. From this date, people who have been fully vaccinated for at least 14 days, as well as under-18s, will not have to self-isolate if they come into contact with someone who has tested positive for Covid-19. Instead, people will be contacted by NHS Test and Trace and advised to take a PCR test. If that test is positive then they must isolate. UK heading into 'biggest Covid wave we've ever seen', says Government adviser as he urges 'great caution' Anyone who tests positive will still have to quarantine for 10 days, regardless of their vaccination status. But there have been calls for the Government to bring this date forward for fully vaccinated people. CBI president Lord Karan Bilimoria said: "With restrictions being lifted and cases rapidly increasing, we urgently need a surefooted approach from the Government, creating confidence to secure the recovery. "This starts by immediately ending the self-isolation period of 10 days for people who are double-jabbed and providing a route out of isolation for those not yet fully vaccinated through daily lateral flow tests. Against the backdrop of crippling staff shortages, speed is of the essence." I-News.co.uk

Deep State actor #1- Susan Michie Social distancing rules could be needed 'forever' to stop Covid, says SAGE scientist Professor Susan Michie, of University College London, said she thinks some restrictions could be needed over the long-term as Brits wait for Boris Johnson is the so-called Freedom Day can happen on June 21

UCL video Technocrat Susan Michie

TO LAST FOREVER?

Un-Herd Interview with Technocrat Susan Michie

There are ideoligical oddities in Susan Michies narrative Michie announces no Communist party members will be standing in UK election - choosing instead to help ruin Corbyns chances? Here Michie is a "lefty" supporting Corbyn

(or steering and infiltation / garauntee'ing of Corbyn failure on behalf of Whitehall MI5 fascists?)

well the UK police certainly infiltrated groups see also - The Infiltrator and the Movement see also - Within and beyond the law? British communist history and the archives of state surveillance Susan Michie CV Professor Michie' research focuses on behaviour change in relation to health and the environment: how to understand it theoretically and apply theory to intervention development, evaluation and implementation.. Her research, collaborating with disciplines such as information science, environmental science, computer science and medicine, covers population, organisational and individual level interventions. Examples include the Human Behaviour-Change Project (www.humanbehaviourchange.org) and Complex Systems for Sustainability and Health www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/environmental-design/research/research-projects/cussh. She is an investigator on three Covid-19 research projects. She serves as an expert advisor on the UK's Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavioural Science (Covid-19) and is a consultant advisor to the World Health Organisation on Covid-19 and behaviour. She is also expert advisor to Public Health England and the UK Department of Health and Social Care, is Chair of the UK Food Standard Agency's Social Sciences Advisory Committee and chaired the Academy of Social Science's "˜Health of People" project. Human Behaviour Change.org The Human Behaviour-Change Project (HBCP) is creating an online "Knowledge System" that uses Artificial Intelligence, in particular Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning, to extract information from intervention evaluation reports to answer key questions about the evidence. It is a collaboration between behavioural scientists, computer scientists and systems architects. The Knowledge System will continually search publication databases to find behaviour change intervention evaluation reports, extract and synthesise the findings, provide up-to-date answers to questions, and draw inferences about behaviour change. Practitioners, policy makers and researchers will be able to query the system to obtain answers to variants of the key question: "˜What intervention(s) work, compared with what, how well, with what exposure, with what behaviours, for how long, for whom, in what settings and why?" The project team is committed to open science and generating products and resources for the scientific community to use. These will be accessible via this website. There is strong engagement of the scientific community as the project evolves, with an International Advisory Board and peer review panels to comment on specific components. look at the sponsors Wellcome Trust & IBM This is about data & AI / behavior change Is the PINGDEMIC an experiment by this group? The government has clarified that self-isolation after being "pinged” by the NHS COVID-19 app is not a legal requirement, however approaching six in ten British people (59%) think that it is. Only a quarter of people (25%) correctly identified that pings from the NHS app are not legally binding. YOU GOV POLL University College London - Complex Urban Systems for Sustainability and Health (CUSSH) is a four-year Wellcome Trust funded project that will deliver key global research on the systems that connect urban development and population health. Applied systems analysis How does this look? Susan Michies Fascistic support for the very government she directed her Party members to oppose by supporting Jeremy Corbyns push for PM

"Pingdemic" is an experiment to see how many citizen drone consumers trust & obey the governmment messaging on their smart phones They are not even hiding the fact it is an experiment

The "freedom day" experiment

To its critics, the decision by the Boris Johnson government to roll back social distancing and other measures designed to limit the spread of coronavirus would lead to a surge in new cases. Some feared the emergence of new variants. "On the basis of the spread of the delta variant, and the U.K. government's decision to lift all legal restrictions on individual mobility, mixing and adherence to nonpharmaceutical interventions, we expected new COVID-19 infections to rise very sharply," said David Mackie, an economist at JPMorgan. Just the opposite has happened. The seven-day average of new cases in the U.K. peaked on July 20, just a day after "Freedom Day" was declared, and has dropped sharply since. Granted, hospitalizations have increased, but the trend is similar to previously. "Possible additional explanations are a seasonal weather effect and an early arrival of the school vacation effect," said Mackie. "But it is hard to fully explain the dramatic collapse in new infections." The flip side, however, is that the new freedoms haven't materially changed behavior. While mask wearing is less pronounced inside stores and restaurants, a look at Google mobility data finds U.K. movement much as it's been during the last few months. And the mobility differences aren't terribly different in Scotland, where the restrictions are still in place until early August. That suggests the economic benefits of opening up may not materially accelerate either. "We would argue that the 'reopening trade,' i.e. companies such as those in the retail and hospitality sectors that have been among the early beneficiaries of the reopening of the U.K. economy, has largely run its course," said Alan Custis, head of U.K. equities at Lazard Asset Management. "Following this initial relief rally, some businesses may start to find that sustaining growth at these levels is challenging, especially when supports - such as the value-added-tax relief for the hospitality sector - are removed." The midcap FTSE 250 index MCX, +0.57%, which is considered more a play than the large-cap FTSE 100 UK:UKX on the U.K. economy, has climbed 13% this year. Market Watch

Synthetic data?

Technocrat #2 - Neil Ferguson

high-performance computing,
mathematical models
of infectious disease

Neil Ferguson was on the original team
that oversaw the Foot & mouth
fake epidemic in the UK alongside Roy Anderson

[Imperial College epidemiologist Neil] Ferguson was behind the disputed research that sparked the mass culling of eleven million sheep and cattle during the 2001 outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. He also predicted that up to 150,000 people could die. There were fewer than 200 deaths. . . . In 2002, Ferguson predicted that up to 50,000 people would likely die from exposure to BSE (mad cow disease) in beef. In the U.K., there were only 177 deaths from BSE. In 2005, Ferguson predicted that up to 150 million people could be killed from bird flu. In the end, only 282 people died worldwide from the disease between 2003 and 2009. In 2009, a government estimate, based on Ferguson’s advice, said a "reasonable worst-case scenario" was that the swine flu would lead to 65,000 British deaths. In the end, swine flu killed 457 people in the U.K. Last March, Ferguson admitted that his Imperial College model of the COVID-19 disease was based on undocumented, 13-year-old computer code that was intended to be used for a feared influenza pandemic, rather than a coronavirus. Ferguson declined to release his original code so other scientists could check his results. He only released a heavily revised set of code last week, after a six-week delay. So the real scandal is: Why did anyone ever listen to this guy? Stat Modelling

The original experiment?

My research aims to improve understanding of the epidemiological factors and population processes shaping infectious disease spread in human and animal populations. A key practical focus is the analysis and optimisation of intervention strategies aimed at reducing transmission or disease burden. Much of my work is applied, informing disease control policy-making by public and global health institutions. With recent advances in data availability (both epidemiological and molecular) and affordable high-performance computing, mathematical models of infectious disease spread now offer the potential to provide predictive, quantitative analyses of alternative disease control and treatment strategies, as well as qualitative insight into the complex non-linear processes shaping pathogen replication and evolution. An important strand of my research program is therefore to develop the statistical and mathematical tools necessary for such increasingly sophisticated models to be rigorously tested and validated against epidemiological, molecular and experimental data. The breadth of my research interests reflects my belief that comparative analyses of different host-pathogen systems can provide powerful insights into the population processes common to many infectious diseases, while highlighting how key differences in disease biology, route of transmission or host population structure determine observed differences in patterns of infection. Imperial College

Flashback to January 2020

here's the first announcement by the WHO of Covid 19 made 5th Jan 2020 INTERESTINGLY 2020 Jan 8 - Jane Parry writes in the BMJ Pneumonia in China: lack of information raises concerns among Hong Kong health workers "Without access to the genetic sequencing data from China, it is impossible to create the assay that would enable rapid, mass testing should there be a cluster of cases in Hong Kong," said Ho Pak-Leung, president of the Carol Yu Centre of Infection at the University of Hong Kong. “There is a large group of people with the disease, which means there are a lot of samples available for testing. The latest genetic sequencing methods should enable researchers to have the sequence of the virus in two to three days. Why are they not releasing the results?” Ho and other Hong Kong microbiologists have told the Hong Kong government that they are willing to go to Wuhan to better understand the clinical situation of the outbreak, which would put them in a better position to advise their own government about how to protect public health. “I’m very concerned because this seems to be a novel virus, likely a coronavirus, and within a short period, from 12 December to 5 January, there were a lot of cases. I think that we are dealing with a super spreading event in Wuhan,” said Ho. As at 5 January, 30 patients had arrived in Hong Kong from Wuhan with fever or other suspicious symptoms and were kept under observation, but no confirmed cases have been found so far. read that again As at 5 January... There is a large group of people with the disease, which means there are a lot of samples available for testing. The latest genetic sequencing methods should enable researchers to have the sequence of the virus in two to three days. Why are they not releasing the results? this seems to be a novel virus no confirmed cases have been found so far but curiously it was established that the virus was isolated from a SINGLE PATIENT ON 7TH JANUARY and this information was released as an official update on the outbreak of COVID 19 by the WHO The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health — The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China The city of Wuhan in China is the focus of global attention due to an outbreak of a febrile respiratory illness due to a coronavirus 2019-nCoV. In December 2019, there was an outbreak of pneumonia of unknown cause in Wuhan, Hubei province in China, with an epidemiological link to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market where there was also sale of live animals. Notification of the WHO on 31 Dec 2019 by the Chinese Health Authorities has prompted health authorities in Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan to step up border surveillance, and generated concern and fears that it could mark the emergence of a novel and serious threat to public health (WHO, 2020a, Parr, 2020). The Chinese health authorities have taken prompt public health measures including intensive surveillance, epidemiological investigations, and closure of the market on 1 Jan 2020. SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, avian influenza, influenza and other common respiratory viruses were ruled out. The Chinese scientists were able to isolate a 2019-nCoV from A PATIENT within a short time on 7 Jan 2020 and perform genome sequencing of the 2019-nCoV. The genetic sequence of the 2019-nCoV has become available to the WHO on 12 Jan 2020 and this has facilitated the laboratories in different countries to produce specific diagnostic PCR tests for detecting the novel infection (WHO, 2020b). The 2019-nCoV is a ß CoV of group 2B with at least 70% similarity in genetic sequence to SARS-CoV and has been named 2019-nCoV by the WHO. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7128332/ that was Published online 2020 Jan 14 The genetic sequence of the 2019-nCoV had become available to the WHO on 12 Jan 2020 derived from a SINGLE PATIENT and...the entire Bat market narrative was posited, seeded & established by the WHO on the 5th January 2020

Prof. Drostens PCR admission

The PCR test for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus developed by Drosten in January 2020 at lightning speed is "the test of the year”! These test results are the legitimation for national governments worldwide to enforce the most massive restrictions of fundamental rights against citizens! As recently as 2014, Drosten said of this PCR test method: "The method is so sensitive that it can detect a single hereditary molecule of this virus. If such a pathogen, for example, flits across a nurse's nasal mucosa for a day without her getting sick or noticing anything else, she is suddenly a MERS case. Where previously, people at death's door were reported, now mild cases and even people without symptoms are suddenly included in the reporting statistics. This could also explain the explosion in the number of cases in Saudi Arabia. On top of this, the local media have made an incredible fuss about it." Christian Drosten & the Fraud Behind COVID 19 PCR Testing

circular reasoning for novel virus detection

"The original sequences came from a single case, who was said to have Covid 19, because they had detected some genetic sequences, and these sequences mean that person has Covid 19."

Synthetic Virus?

Dr Sam Bailey exposes the massive evidence to suggest that the entire Pandemic is nothing more than a computer generated fake disease... here's her research references for the video: 1. Dr David Martin's deposition: https://odysee.com/@thecrowhouse:2/Brighteon:5 2. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7159299/ 3. Pollution comparisons: https://www.numbeo.com/pollution/compare_cities.jsp?country1=Switzerland&country2=China&city1=Zurich&city2=Wuhan&tracking=getDispatchComparison 4. Pneumonia Incidence and Mortality in Mainland China: Systematic Review of Chinese and English Literature, 1985–2008: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0011721 5. Notes from the Field: A Novel Coronavirus Genome Identified in a Cluster of Pneumonia Cases — Wuhan, China 2019-2020: http://weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/article/id/a3907201-f64f-4154-a19e-4253b453d10c 6. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045 7. Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments: https://www.gene-quantification.de/miqe-bustin-et-al-clin-chem-2009.pdf 8. Dr Kelvin Watson's PCR claim via OIA request: https://fyi.org.nz/request/14341/response/54651/attach/4/H202100581%20Virginia%20Crawford%20Response%20letter.pdf 9. NZ Ministry of Health unable to provide evidence of their PCR claims: https://fyi.org.nz/request/15780-clinical-sensitivity-and-specificity-for-the-detection-of-sars-cov-2#comment-4053 10. How much RNA does a typical mammalian cell contain?: https://www.qiagen.com/us/resources/faq?id=06a192c2-e72d-42e8-9b40-3171e1eb4cb8&lang=en 11. OffGuardian - PCR Inventor: "It doesn't tell you that you are sick”: https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/05/pcr-inventor-it-doesnt-tell-you-that-you-are-sick/ 12. Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045880/

Fran Leaders E-mail exchange with the UK MRHA

SYNTHETIC CURE?

Imperial Oxford president - Alice Gast admits RNA technology is Synthetic Biology. Alice Gast speaks; Technology Governance Outlook @41 mins "The Pandemic has made it obvious to us that Viruses are a risk. They don't know boundaries so the importance of the inclusion of this colloboration is stark. The also show you the really fantastic advances of science and basically science going on for a decade that led to the rapid ability to create new vaccines with unprecesdented speed. And synthetic biology is a really interesting topic because it is a means of creating new molcules and new life...& unlike chemistry, it is built through biological processes rather than chemical reactions. Perhaps there is no better example of synthetic biology than the RNA Vaccines that we're benefitting from today. So there you have the great benefits or the great risks of biology working for you or going wrong."

IMPERIAL Collage Oxford @ The WEF 2019 Alice Gast President of Imperial Oxford college introduces the MRNA technology Davos participants will get the chance to hear from Imperial College experts Wendy Barclay, Robin Shattock and Jason Hallett who are working to reverse the inverse care law as they advance vaccine technology, helping it to leapfrog existing options. Their work enables unprecedentedly rapid production of new vaccine doses, within weeks of a disease threat being identified. Their teams are also developing new room-temperature storage options that could eliminate the use of cold chains: a major hindrance to storing vaccines in low-income countries. Professor Barclay is even working to stop diseases like influenza spreading without the need for vaccines. World Economic Forum President Gast also chaired the Global University Leaders Forum (GULF) and spoke on a panel with President of Colombia Iván Duque Márquez and global CEOs, including Marc Benioff of Salesforce to update on the Centres for the Fourth Industrial Revolution Network.

UK Imperial Oxford at the WEF 2019 Three Imperial scientists presented their ideas on next generation vaccines to global leaders at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. The academics from Imperial's Network for Vaccine Research, joined leaders from the G20 and other countries, CEOs of multinationals, members of international organisations and other scientists at the WEF Annual Meeting. The Imperial group lead an IdeasLab session titled '˜Developing a Vaccine Revolution'. Imperian.ac.uk

Imperial Network for Vaccine Research FUNDING From BMGF Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Borne Foundation Borne Foundation DARPA Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency EDCTP European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership European Commission European Commission FP7 European Commission European Commission Horizon 2020 MRC logo Medical Research Council NC3RS The National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research NIH National Institutes of Health PATH PATH Wellcome Wellcome Trust WHO World Health Organization https://www.imperial.ac.uk/vaccine-research-network

Australia - Delta variant Emergency Case-demic
from Queensland to Sydney...
a strategy of tension?

June 27th - Miners in out of town remote area test positive. NO DEATHS Cases linked to a major Central Australian gold mine sent Greater Darwin into a 48-hour lockdown on Sunday 21st June. In a statement, Queensland Health said contact tracing efforts were underway and more exposure sites would be listed on the Queensland Health website.

Fear ramped - police state imposed...Delta protocol established

Neighbours...Everybody needs good neighbours? Computer says NO!

24th July - Global Lockdown / Vaccine Passport protests...

A case? From the protests you say? OMG Panic!

Govt. puts troops on the streets!

Get the Jab! More Bribery, co-ersion & threats

Compare & contrast - Is this really about health?

We're all different because our genetic make-up is different, in fact your DNA is unique to you. This genetic code also determines which foods are good or bad for us. It's not a diet, you still decide what to eat. DnaNudge uses your own DNA to nudge you towards healthier choices each time you shop. These every day small swaps can lead to big positive changes to your health over the long term.

The Ping-demic is a test run for "automated" - "CBDC / Social Credit / Universal Based Income" society. a world of TOTAL SURVEILLANCE

Bank of England to Ministers: Digital cash could be programmed to ensure it is only spent on essentials June 27, 2021 by IWB The Bank of England has called on ministers to decide whether a central bank digital currency should be "programmable”, ultimately giving the issuer control over how it is spent by the recipient. Tom Mutton, a director at the Bank of England, said during a conference on Monday that programming could become a key feature of any future central bank digital currency, in which the money would be programmed to be released only when something happened. "There could be some socially beneficial outcomes from that, preventing activity which is seen to be socially harmful in some way…” "One potential use could be control over benefits payments” See also Dems Panic After Learning They Could LOSE a Senate Seat "You could think of giving your children pocket money, but programming the money so that it couldn't be used for sweets. There is a whole range of things that money could do, programmable money, which we cannot do with the current technology.” Investment watch blog

Will Power crazed Governments recognise the noticable difference between Programmable Money & Programmable payments? "When talking about programmability, it is crucial to note the distinction between programmable money and programmable payments. The two terms are often used interchangeably, but there is a difference. Programmable money is designed with in-built rules that constrain the user. These rules could mean that money expires after a fixed date or its use is restricted to a certain set of goods. This would affect digital currency acceptance and has obvious legal implications." - Wolfram Seidemann, CEO of G+D Currency Technology.

"We now have a new ID card snuck onto our phones without even as much as a whisper from the government."

Overseen by grey faceless Orwellian technocratic mandarins, many with a history in deep state / behavioural science / control groups

This is a trial run...globalised Tyrannical martial law...will be normalised Vaccinated versus un-vaccinated as the Stategy of Tension model for a worldwide bio security state

Computer says: Terror! algorithm predicts non state terror?

Pentagon is supposedly combining data with machine learning and other forms of artificial intelligence to gain enough of an informational edge to enable the proactive approach. The series of tests is called the Global Information Dominance Experiments (GIDE), in which data from a huge variety of sources, including satellite imagery, intelligence reports, sensors in the field, radar, and more are collected. This third set of GIDE testing is completed, and a fourth is planned further. The first GIDE test was done in December of 2020 where AI-enabled early warning alerts of peer-level threat movements were prototyped. In March 2021, the GIDE-2 was conducted which used AI and machine learning to use the information to respond to real-life scenarios, like to predict the next plan of the enemy. With help of Cloud computing, the vast amount of data collected worldwide can be processed efficiently which could be accessed by military officials and agencies who need them. In a press briefing, last week US Air Force General Glen D. VanHerck said, “GIDE, the Global Information Dominance Experiments, embodies a fundamental change in how we use information and data to increase decision space for leaders from the tactical level to the strategic level – not only military leaders but [it] also allows our civilian leaders.” The idea is to predict other nation’s moves before which could help in discourage and precautions can be taken previously to avoid mishappening. source

Research on armed conflict and insurgency has led to the development of predictive models informed by theory (1“7), which includes a recent successful research program that applies machine learning algorithms to predict conflict at fine spatiotemporal scales (8“10). This literature highlights that theoretically informed modeling strongly improves the predictive performance of machine learning techniques. However, this important insight from armed conflict research (11, 12) has not found its way into terrorism studies, yet. Terrorism research, by and large, has focused on explanatory models, applying statistical approaches to capture and quantify the effects of drivers of terrorist attacks in space and time (13“15). There is one notable exception; Ding et al. (16) predict terrorism at a fine spatial scale. However, the authors aggregated the data on a yearly level, which ineluctably ignores the short-term dynamics of terrorism and cannot provide the necessary information for policy makers to implement targeted and rapid counterterrorism measures. Consequentially, there is a need to develop an interpretable modeling framework to predict terrorist events at fine spatial and temporal scales that can help policy makers implement efficient interventions and assess and develop theories at relevant scales. Science Mag

Computer says Eureka?

"In my view, an inventor as recognised under the act
can be an artificial intelligence system or device"

Click for story

Australia - 30th July 2021 - An artificial intelligence system is capable of being an "inventor” under Australian patent law, the federal court has ruled, in a decision that could have wider intellectual property implications. University of Surrey professor Ryan Abbott has launched more than a dozen patent applications across the globe, including in the UK, US, New Zealand and Australia, on behalf of US-based Dr Stephen Thaler. They seek to have Thaler's artificial intelligence device known as Dabus (a device for the autonomous bootstrapping of unified sentience) listed as the inventor. The applications claimed Dabus, which is made up of artificial neural networks, invented an emergency warning light and a type of food container, among other inventions.

What's the bet that A.I will be credited with inventing a virus under patent? an ever changing production line of artificial bio-warfare against humanity in a biosecuity police state As the Data analyst state actors push scary graphs keeping the public in obedience & fear the Computer says "IMMINENT DEATH" The Military pharma industrial bio-complex says: "oooh Profit!"

Click for story

Click for story

29 November 2020
UK PM Johnson Appoints Zahawi as Vaccine Minister

Nadim Zahawis Elite connections

much more @Spacestation Earth